South American Indian vs Taiwanese Married-couple Households
COMPARE
South American Indian
Taiwanese
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
South American Indians
Taiwanese
46.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
28.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
23.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Taiwanese Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,449 people shows no correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 46.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,715,954 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 0.24%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Taiwanese |
Minimum | 33.6% | 20.6% |
Maximum | 85.1% | 74.9% |
Range | 51.5% | 54.3% |
Mean | 52.6% | 47.4% |
Median | 48.0% | 46.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 44.3% | 38.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.6% | 54.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.3% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Taiwanese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Fijian (46.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (46.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (46.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kuwait (46.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Choctaw (46.0%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Chickasaw (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Choctaw (46.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Mongolians | 42.0 /100 | #180 | Average 46.3% |
Malaysians | 41.8 /100 | #181 | Average 46.3% |
Yugoslavians | 38.9 /100 | #182 | Fair 46.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 38.3 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.2% |
Brazilians | 35.9 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.2% |
Albanians | 31.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.1% |
Fijians | 29.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.1% |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |