Slavic vs Chickasaw Average Family Size
COMPARE
Slavic
Chickasaw
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Slavs
Chickasaw
3.13
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.19
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
6.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Chickasaw Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,815,552 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122 and weighted average of 3.13. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,515 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 3.19, a difference of 1.9%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.00 | 2.14 |
Maximum | 4.96 | 4.35 |
Range | 2.96 | 2.21 |
Mean | 2.94 | 3.19 |
Median | 2.93 | 3.16 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.72 | 3.04 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.07 | 3.32 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.35 | 0.28 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.44 | 0.38 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.44 | 0.37 |
Similar Demographics by Average Family Size
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Northern European (3.13, a difference of 0.010%), Czechoslovakian (3.13, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Serbia (3.13, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ireland (3.13, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (3.13, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Macedonians | 0.2 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.13 |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.2 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.13 |
British | 0.2 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.13 |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.2 /100 | #304 | Tragic 3.13 |
Australians | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic 3.13 |
Immigrants | Ireland | 0.1 /100 | #306 | Tragic 3.13 |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.1 /100 | #307 | Tragic 3.13 |
Slavs | 0.1 /100 | #308 | Tragic 3.13 |
Northern Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #309 | Tragic 3.13 |
Czechoslovakians | 0.1 /100 | #310 | Tragic 3.13 |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 0.1 /100 | #311 | Tragic 3.13 |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.1 /100 | #312 | Tragic 3.13 |
Bulgarians | 0.1 /100 | #313 | Tragic 3.13 |
Russians | 0.1 /100 | #314 | Tragic 3.12 |
Immigrants | Scotland | 0.1 /100 | #315 | Tragic 3.12 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Portuguese (3.19, a difference of 0.0%), Cree (3.19, a difference of 0.020%), Nonimmigrants (3.19, a difference of 0.030%), Syrian (3.19, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Italy (3.19, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Pennsylvania Germans | 9.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.19 |
Lebanese | 9.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 7.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 7.2 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 7.1 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.19 |
Syrians | 6.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.19 |
Cree | 6.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.19 |
Chickasaw | 6.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.19 |
Portuguese | 6.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 5.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.19 |
Immigrants | Italy | 5.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.19 |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.19 |
Basques | 5.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.19 |
Cherokee | 4.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.18 |
Brazilians | 4.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.18 |