Scandinavian vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Chickasaw
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Scandinavians
Chickasaw
28.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,042,007 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,673,787 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 0.85%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scandinavian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 8.1% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 62.8% |
Range | 91.9% | 56.3% |
Mean | 32.9% | 27.4% |
Median | 28.0% | 27.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.4% | 22.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.4% | 30.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.0% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.1% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.9% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians and Chickasaw by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Tohono O'odham (28.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (28.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Panamanian (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Indonesians | 98.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 98.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Sioux | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Choctaw | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.0 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 97.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 97.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Spaniards | 97.4 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Scandinavians | 97.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 28.0% |