Pima vs Iroquois Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Pima
Iroquois
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Pima
Iroquois
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
9.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Iroquois Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,534,200 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243 and weighted average of 27.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,224,284 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090 and weighted average of 26.1%, a difference of 4.0%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Iroquois |
Minimum | 13.8% | 5.2% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 35.2% |
Range | 36.2% | 30.1% |
Mean | 29.2% | 24.7% |
Median | 27.5% | 25.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.8% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.9% | 29.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to Pima by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Paraguayan (27.1%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), German (27.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Austrian (27.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Japan (27.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |
New Zealanders | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 27.1% |
Paraguayans | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 27.1% |
Pima | 9.2 /100 | #223 | Tragic 27.1% |
Germans | 8.7 /100 | #224 | Tragic 27.1% |
Canadians | 7.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 27.1% |
Czechoslovakians | 6.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 27.0% |
Tsimshian | 6.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 27.0% |
Scottish | 6.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 6.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 27.0% |
Bulgarians | 5.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Ottawa (26.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from France (26.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Tlingit-Haida (26.0%, a difference of 0.10%), British West Indian (26.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Estonian (26.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 26.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 26.2% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 26.2% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 26.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 26.1% |
Estonians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 26.1% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.1% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.1% |
Immigrants | France | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.0% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 26.0% |