Pima vs Chinese Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Pima
Chinese
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Pima
Chinese
35.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
50.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Chinese Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,795 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.854 and weighted average of 35.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 50.4%, a difference of 41.6%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Chinese |
Minimum | 6.1% | 35.3% |
Maximum | 74.1% | 63.0% |
Range | 68.0% | 27.8% |
Mean | 36.2% | 50.6% |
Median | 40.0% | 51.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.6% | 46.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.1% | 56.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.5% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.4% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.1% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Pima by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (36.2%, a difference of 1.9%), Hopi (36.7%, a difference of 3.2%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (37.3%, a difference of 5.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (37.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and Tohono O'odham (37.9%, a difference of 6.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 39.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 38.7% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 38.6% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 38.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 38.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 38.4% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 38.3% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 38.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 38.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 37.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 37.5% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 37.3% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 36.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 35.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Pennsylvania German (50.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Pakistan (50.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (50.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Swiss (49.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Korea (49.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 51.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 51.8% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 51.6% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 51.1% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 51.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 50.6% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 50.1% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Swedes | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.6% |