Osage vs South African Average Family Size
COMPARE
Osage
South African
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Osage
South Africans
3.18
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.17
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
1.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs South African Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,797,548 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350 and weighted average of 3.18. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,542,569 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 3.17, a difference of 0.30%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | South African |
Minimum | 2.23 | 2.17 |
Maximum | 4.00 | 4.21 |
Range | 1.77 | 2.04 |
Mean | 3.08 | 3.02 |
Median | 3.14 | 3.07 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.89 | 2.72 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.27 | 3.28 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.38 | 0.56 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.39 | 0.44 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.38 | 0.44 |
Demographics Similar to Osage and South Africans by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Houma (3.18, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (3.18, a difference of 0.020%), Hungarian (3.18, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Moldova (3.18, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (3.18, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (3.17, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Hungary (3.17, a difference of 0.0%), Cape Verdean (3.17, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (3.17, a difference of 0.030%), and Puget Sound Salish (3.17, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Romania | 3.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 3.18 |
Romanians | 3.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.18 |
Houma | 3.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.18 |
Osage | 3.2 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Japan | 3.0 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.18 |
Hungarians | 3.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Moldova | 2.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 2.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 3.18 |
Immigrants | Brazil | 2.7 /100 | #245 | Tragic 3.18 |
Danes | 2.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 3.17 |
Cajuns | 2.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Belarus | 2.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 2.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 3.17 |
Puget Sound Salish | 1.9 /100 | #250 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Spain | 1.8 /100 | #251 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 3.17 |
South Africans | 1.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Hungary | 1.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 3.17 |
Cape Verdeans | 1.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 3.17 |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 1.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 3.17 |