Mongolian vs Potawatomi Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Mongolian
Potawatomi
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Mongolians
Potawatomi
46.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
42.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
15.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Potawatomi Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,286,033 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.081 and weighted average of 46.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,759,864 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.192 and weighted average of 45.7%, a difference of 1.3%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mongolian | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 20.0% | 22.2% |
Maximum | 81.2% | 76.1% |
Range | 61.2% | 53.9% |
Mean | 50.3% | 47.2% |
Median | 48.6% | 47.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.0% | 41.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.1% | 53.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.1% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Potawatomi by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Malaysian (46.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Yugoslavian (46.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Switzerland (46.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Brazilian (46.2%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Carpatho Rusyn (45.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Ottawa (45.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and Chickasaw (45.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Mongolians | 42.0 /100 | #180 | Average 46.3% |
Malaysians | 41.8 /100 | #181 | Average 46.3% |
Yugoslavians | 38.9 /100 | #182 | Fair 46.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 38.3 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.2% |
Brazilians | 35.9 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.2% |
Albanians | 31.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.1% |
Fijians | 29.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.1% |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |