Malaysian vs Cherokee Single Father Households
COMPARE
Malaysian
Cherokee
Single Father Households
Single Father Households Comparison
Malaysians
Cherokee
2.7%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
278th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Cherokee Single Father Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,437,553 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,508,076 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 4.1%.
Single Father Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Cherokee |
Minimum | 0.53% | 0.86% |
Maximum | 9.3% | 10.9% |
Range | 8.8% | 10.0% |
Mean | 3.5% | 3.6% |
Median | 3.1% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 4.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Cherokee by Single Father Households
In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Immigrants from Fiji (2.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Choctaw (2.7%, a difference of 0.59%), Chickasaw (2.8%, a difference of 0.80%), Japanese (2.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and Blackfeet (2.7%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Samoan (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Shoshone (2.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Portugal (2.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and Nicaraguan (2.6%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Households |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 2.6% |
Samoans | 0.1 /100 | #279 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 2.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 2.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 2.7% |
Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 2.7% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 2.7% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 2.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 2.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 2.7% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 2.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 2.7% |
Malaysians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 2.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 2.8% |
Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 2.8% |