Latvian vs Australian Family Households
COMPARE
Latvian
Australian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Latvians
Australians
62.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Australian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,652,081 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 62.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,034,220 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.302 and weighted average of 62.8%, a difference of 0.14%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Australian |
| Minimum | 31.0% | 31.6% |
| Maximum | 92.3% | 82.4% |
| Range | 61.3% | 50.9% |
| Mean | 65.1% | 64.8% |
| Median | 65.3% | 64.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 60.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.9% | 70.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Australians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are British West Indian (62.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (62.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Mongolian (62.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nepal (62.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Denmark (62.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Denmark (62.9%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (62.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Estonian (62.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Mongolian (62.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and British West Indian (62.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| West Indians | 0.3 /100 | #275 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Serbians | 0.3 /100 | #276 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Ottawa | 0.3 /100 | #277 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 0.2 /100 | #278 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.2 /100 | #279 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Estonians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 62.9% |
| New Zealanders | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Australians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Mongolians | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 62.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Latvians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 62.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic 62.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 62.6% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 62.6% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 62.6% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 62.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 62.5% |
| Okinawans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 62.5% |