Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Alaska Native Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Alaska Native
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Alaska Natives
65.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Alaska Native Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,689,020 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 65.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,756,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364 and weighted average of 65.1%, a difference of 0.10%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Alaska Native |
Minimum | 45.9% | 34.1% |
Maximum | 96.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 50.3% | 65.9% |
Mean | 69.0% | 70.5% |
Median | 67.0% | 69.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.5% | 62.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.1% | 81.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 19.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Alaska Natives by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Haitian (65.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Chilean (65.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Indian (Asian) (65.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Spaniard (65.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and Central American Indian (65.2%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are White/Caucasian (65.1%, a difference of 0.0%), English (65.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (65.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guatemala (65.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Scandinavian (65.0%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Guatemalans | 98.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Central American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Haitians | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Chileans | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Spaniards | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.1% |
English | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |