Immigrants from Serbia vs African Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Africans
61.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,724,151 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085 and weighted average of 61.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,598,671 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 0.84%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | African |
Minimum | 44.5% | 32.6% |
Maximum | 82.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 37.8% | 67.4% |
Mean | 63.4% | 62.8% |
Median | 62.6% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.2% | 58.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.5% | 66.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia and Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Tlingit-Haida (61.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Ugandan (61.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Bermudan (62.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Subsaharan African (62.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Iroquois (62.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |