Immigrants from Pakistan vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,710,080 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.685 and weighted average of 30.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,827,817 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630 and weighted average of 29.7%, a difference of 1.8%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Pakistan	Guamanian/Chamorro
Minimum	7.4%	8.6%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	92.6%	91.4%
Mean	33.0%	32.8%
Median	31.8%	29.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	29.1%	25.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	34.0%	34.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.9%	8.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.1%	16.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.0%	16.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Pakistan and Guamanians/Chamorros by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Afghan (30.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Bangladeshi (30.1%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (30.0%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (30.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and Nepalese (30.5%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Mexican American Indian (29.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Latin America (29.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (29.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Laos (29.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (29.8%, a difference of 0.45%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Yakama	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 30.8%
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 30.6%
Immigrants \| Fiji	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 30.5%
Nepalese	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 30.5%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 30.2%
Afghans	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 30.2%
Bangladeshis	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 30.1%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 30.0%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 30.0%
Hispanics or Latinos	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 29.9%
Salvadorans	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 29.9%
Alaska Natives	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 29.9%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 29.8%
Immigrants \| Laos	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 29.8%
Malaysians	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 29.8%
Mexican American Indians	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 29.7%
Guamanians/Chamorros	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 29.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 29.7%
Sri Lankans	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 29.5%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 29.5%
Samoans	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 29.5%