Immigrants from Oceania vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Chinese
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Chinese
30.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Chinese Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,126,305 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 30.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,513,648 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522 and weighted average of 30.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Chinese |
Minimum | 8.4% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 91.6% | 94.5% |
Mean | 45.6% | 41.4% |
Median | 33.0% | 33.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.6% | 24.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.6% | 48.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 29.9% | 24.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.4% | 25.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.9% | 25.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Chinese by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Northern European (30.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from North America (30.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Czech (30.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uganda (30.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and South African (30.5%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Icelander (30.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Spain (30.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (30.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (30.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and New Zealander (30.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Chinese | 87.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 30.2% |
Icelanders | 86.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Spain | 85.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 85.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 30.3% |
New Zealanders | 85.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 85.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 30.4% |
Brazilians | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.9 /100 | #137 | Excellent 30.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 30.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 83.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 30.4% |
Swiss | 83.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 30.5% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #141 | Excellent 30.5% |
South Africans | 82.7 /100 | #142 | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 82.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 30.5% |
Czechs | 82.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants | North America | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 30.6% |
Northern Europeans | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 30.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #147 | Excellent 30.6% |