Immigrants from Lithuania vs Native/Alaskan Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Native/Alaskan
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Natives/Alaskans
48.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Native/Alaskan Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,724,932 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 48.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,977,387 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.760 and weighted average of 42.8%, a difference of 14.1%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 40.5% | 19.1% |
Maximum | 64.7% | 53.7% |
Range | 24.2% | 34.6% |
Mean | 53.5% | 38.9% |
Median | 53.4% | 41.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 50.4% | 32.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 58.1% | 45.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.7% | 8.3% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Northern Europe (48.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Italian (48.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (48.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Irish (48.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Czechoslovakian (48.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Welsh | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Irish | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 48.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 48.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 48.8% |
Italians | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 48.8% |
Hungarians | 99.4 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 48.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 48.8% |
British | 99.4 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 48.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 48.8% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 48.8% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Guatemalan (42.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Ghanaian (42.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 43.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |