Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Hmong
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Hmong
65.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Hmong Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,252,628 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 65.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,604,422 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 64.9%, a difference of 0.22%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Hmong |
Minimum | 54.2% | 42.8% |
Maximum | 84.6% | 82.3% |
Range | 30.4% | 39.5% |
Mean | 66.5% | 64.2% |
Median | 66.1% | 63.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.7% | 60.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.3% | 67.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and Hmong by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are European (65.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Spanish (65.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Scandinavian (65.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Guatemala (65.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Argentinean (65.0%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belize (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Oceania (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |