Immigrants from Israel vs Pima Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Pima
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Pima
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Pima Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,979,754 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.529 and weighted average of 63.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,539,566 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 3.9%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Pima |
Minimum | 33.2% | 40.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 66.8% | 59.6% |
Mean | 69.4% | 69.9% |
Median | 65.6% | 68.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 63.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.4% | 76.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 11.9% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |