Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs South American Indian Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,235,396 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 28.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,526,695 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.273 and weighted average of 28.0%, a difference of 0.17%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar	South American Indian
Minimum	12.1%	9.4%
Maximum	44.7%	48.9%
Range	32.6%	39.5%
Mean	29.5%	27.5%
Median	28.3%	26.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	26.9%	23.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	33.1%	32.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	9.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.7%	8.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.6%	8.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and South American Indians by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Tohono O'odham (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Arab (28.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (28.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Scandinavian (28.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Spaniard (28.0%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Oceania	98.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 28.1%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	98.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 28.1%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 28.1%
Sioux	98.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 28.1%
Choctaw	98.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 28.1%
Immigrants \| South America	98.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Uganda	97.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	97.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 28.0%
Tohono O'odham	97.6 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 28.0%
Spaniards	97.4 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 28.0%
Scandinavians	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.0 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 28.0%
Arabs	97.0 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 28.0%
South American Indians	96.9 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 28.0%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 28.0%
Pakistanis	96.0 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	95.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 27.9%
Central American Indians	95.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 27.9%
Zimbabweans	95.6 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 27.9%
Europeans	95.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 27.9%
Immigrants \| Western Asia	93.6 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 27.9%