Guyanese vs Hopi Family Households
COMPARE
Guyanese
Hopi
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Guyanese
Hopi
65.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guyanese vs Hopi Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,801,738 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.369 and weighted average of 65.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,733,485 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hopi and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118 and weighted average of 65.3%, a difference of 0.0%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guyanese | Hopi |
Minimum | 43.8% | 38.9% |
Maximum | 98.1% | 95.7% |
Range | 54.2% | 56.8% |
Mean | 68.8% | 70.5% |
Median | 68.1% | 72.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.5% | 62.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.9% | 79.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Guyanese and Hopi by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Immigrants from Poland (65.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Portugal (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Crow (65.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Swiss (65.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Guatemalan (65.2%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hopi are Immigrants from Poland (65.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Crow (65.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Portugal (65.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Swiss (65.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Guatemalan (65.2%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Americans | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 65.4% |
Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 65.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 99.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 99.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Crow | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Hopi | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Guyanese | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Guatemalans | 98.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Central American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Haitians | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Chileans | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |