Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Households
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Immigrants from Latvia
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Ethiopians
Immigrants from Latvia
61.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Latvia Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,101,453 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 61.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,726,313 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 62.0%, a difference of 1.2%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian | Immigrants from Latvia |
Minimum | 43.8% | 31.9% |
Maximum | 92.3% | 86.2% |
Range | 48.5% | 54.2% |
Mean | 64.2% | 61.9% |
Median | 62.0% | 65.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.9% | 55.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.5% | 68.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 13.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 13.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Immigrants from Latvia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from France (61.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Australia (61.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Cambodian (61.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Kiowa (61.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Black/African American (61.5%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Liberian (62.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (61.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.4% |
Cambodians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
Immigrants | France | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 61.3% |
Ethiopians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 61.2% |