Chickasaw vs Malaysian Single Mother Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Malaysian
Single Mother Households
Single Mother Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Malaysians
7.0%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Malaysian Single Mother Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,547,774 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,856,339 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.076 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 3.7%.
Single Mother Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Malaysian |
Minimum | 0.84% | 0.92% |
Maximum | 23.7% | 18.5% |
Range | 22.8% | 17.6% |
Mean | 7.2% | 7.7% |
Median | 6.9% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 9.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Malaysians by Single Mother Households
In terms of single mother households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Choctaw (7.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (7.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Comanche (7.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Ute (7.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.95%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Alaskan Athabascan (7.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Africa (7.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Bermudan (7.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Spanish American Indian (7.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and Dutch West Indian (7.3%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Households |
Comanche | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 7.0% |
Choctaw | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 7.0% |
Chickasaw | 1.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 1.4 /100 | #235 | Tragic 7.0% |
Ute | 1.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 7.1% |
Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 7.1% |
Kiowa | 0.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Panama | 0.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 7.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 7.2% |
Fijians | 0.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 7.2% |
Ecuadorians | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 7.2% |
Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 7.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 0.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 7.2% |
Nicaraguans | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 7.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 7.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 7.3% |
Bermudans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 7.3% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 7.3% |
Malaysians | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 7.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 7.3% |