Chickasaw vs Ecuadorian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ecuadorian
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Chickasaw
Ecuadorians
36.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Ecuadorian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,483,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458 and weighted average of 36.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 300,726,329 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.331 and weighted average of 33.3%, a difference of 9.1%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Ecuadorian |
Minimum | 5.6% | 12.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 68.3% |
Range | 94.4% | 55.8% |
Mean | 53.6% | 35.1% |
Median | 47.0% | 33.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.0% | 27.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 40.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 36.0% | 13.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.3% | 11.3% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (36.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (36.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Potawatomi (36.2%, a difference of 0.14%), American (36.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Portugal (36.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 35.5% |
Bermudans | 0.6 /100 | #249 | Tragic 35.5% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 35.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 36.0% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 36.0% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 36.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 36.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 36.3% |
Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 36.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 36.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 36.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 36.5% |
French American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 36.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are White/Caucasian (33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Celtic (33.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Hawaiian (33.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Sudan (33.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |
Spaniards | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 33.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 5.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 33.7% |