Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Family Households
COMPARE
Cherokee
Immigrants from Scotland
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Cherokee
Immigrants from Scotland
65.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
86.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Scotland Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,383,151 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 65.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,383,501 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129 and weighted average of 64.7%, a difference of 0.39%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Immigrants from Scotland |
| Minimum | 31.0% | 23.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 69.0% | 76.2% |
| Mean | 69.9% | 66.5% |
| Median | 67.9% | 65.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.5% | 60.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.7% | 72.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 13.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Immigrants from Scotland by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Oceania (64.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from China (64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Greek (64.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Cajun (64.8%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |