Central American vs Danish Family Households
COMPARE
Central American
Danish
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Central Americans
Danes
66.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Danish Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,084,166 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 66.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,910,388 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 66.0%, a difference of 0.030%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | Danish |
| Minimum | 55.3% | 29.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 44.7% | 70.8% |
| Mean | 70.2% | 73.3% |
| Median | 69.2% | 72.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.1% | 65.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.4% | 79.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 14.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans and Danes by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.040%), South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |