Burmese vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,672,516 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188 and weighted average of 28.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,199,597 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of 28.3%, a difference of 0.80%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Burmese	Immigrants from Costa Rica
Minimum	14.4%	7.1%
Maximum	60.0%	49.2%
Range	45.6%	42.0%
Mean	30.8%	28.5%
Median	30.1%	27.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	27.7%	23.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	33.0%	33.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.3%	9.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.8%	8.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.8%	8.2%

Demographics Similar to Burmese and Immigrants from Costa Rica by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Honduras (28.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Indonesia (28.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (28.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Laotian (28.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Jordan (28.4%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Liberian (28.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Colombian (28.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (28.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Thailand (28.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Syria (28.4%, a difference of 0.34%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Honduras	99.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 28.5%
Burmese	99.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 28.5%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 28.5%
Iraqis	99.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 28.5%
Laotians	99.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 28.5%
Immigrants \| Jordan	99.9 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 28.4%
Nigerians	99.8 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Nepal	99.8 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Iraq	99.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 28.4%
Natives/Alaskans	99.8 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 28.4%
South Americans	99.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 28.4%
Kenyans	99.8 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 28.4%
Nicaraguans	99.8 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 28.4%
Costa Ricans	99.8 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Syria	99.8 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 28.4%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	99.6 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 28.3%
Colombians	99.6 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 28.3%
Liberians	99.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	99.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 28.3%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.5 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 28.2%