Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Serbia Family Households
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Immigrants from Serbia
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Immigrants from Serbia
61.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Serbia Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,815,060 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 61.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,724,151 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085 and weighted average of 61.6%, a difference of 0.32%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Immigrants from Serbia |
Minimum | 17.8% | 44.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 82.3% |
Range | 82.2% | 37.8% |
Mean | 59.5% | 63.4% |
Median | 59.8% | 62.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 50.9% | 60.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.7% | 67.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.7% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.5% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Immigrants from Serbia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (61.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Ugandan (61.7%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Tlingit-Haida (61.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Switzerland (61.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and Ugandan (61.7%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.4% |
Cambodians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |