African vs Immigrants from Chile Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
African
Immigrants from Chile
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Africans
Immigrants from Chile
39.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
31.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
65.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
African vs Immigrants from Chile Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,094,668 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 39.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,837,772 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.794 and weighted average of 31.2%, a difference of 27.3%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | African | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 16.7% | 10.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 83.3% | 89.1% |
Mean | 62.7% | 36.8% |
Median | 58.0% | 28.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 44.9% | 28.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 80.0% | 36.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 35.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.9% | 21.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.6% | 20.8% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Africans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Caribbean (39.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Dominican (39.8%, a difference of 0.33%), U.S. Virgin Islander (39.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from the Azores (39.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and Apache (39.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 39.0% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 39.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 39.3% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 39.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 39.5% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 39.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 39.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 39.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 39.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 39.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 39.9% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 40.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 40.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 40.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 40.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Slovene (31.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Hungarian (31.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (31.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from England (31.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (31.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Carpatho Rusyns | 73.5 /100 | #156 | Good 30.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 72.1 /100 | #157 | Good 31.0% |
Austrians | 69.9 /100 | #158 | Good 31.0% |
Immigrants | England | 69.4 /100 | #159 | Good 31.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 69.3 /100 | #160 | Good 31.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 68.7 /100 | #161 | Good 31.1% |
Slovenes | 65.9 /100 | #162 | Good 31.2% |
Immigrants | Chile | 65.7 /100 | #163 | Good 31.2% |
Hungarians | 64.1 /100 | #164 | Good 31.2% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 58.1 /100 | #165 | Average 31.4% |
Peruvians | 55.5 /100 | #166 | Average 31.5% |
Dutch | 55.3 /100 | #167 | Average 31.5% |
Belgians | 52.4 /100 | #168 | Average 31.6% |
Slavs | 52.0 /100 | #169 | Average 31.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 51.3 /100 | #170 | Average 31.6% |