Ugandan vs Cherokee 10th Grade
COMPARE
Ugandan
Cherokee
10th Grade
10th Grade Comparison
Ugandans
Cherokee
94.0%
10TH GRADE
80.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
94.1%
10TH GRADE
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Cherokee 10th Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,990,882 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with at least 10th grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 94.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,720,058 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with at least 10th grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 94.1%, a difference of 0.070%.
10th Grade Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Cherokee |
Minimum | 92.1% | 79.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 7.9% | 20.8% |
Mean | 95.9% | 94.8% |
Median | 95.8% | 94.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 94.6% | 93.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 97.6% | 96.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Cherokee by 10th Grade
In terms of 10th grade, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Arab (94.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ukraine (94.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Egyptian (94.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (94.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Chickasaw (94.1%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (94.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Nonimmigrants (94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Hmong (94.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (94.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chickasaw (94.1%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 10th Grade |
Shoshone | 90.8 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 94.2% |
Arapaho | 90.5 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 94.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 89.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 94.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 89.4 /100 | #139 | Excellent 94.2% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 94.1% |
Hmong | 86.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 94.1% |
Albanians | 86.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 94.1% |
Cherokee | 84.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 94.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 94.1% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 83.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 94.1% |
Chickasaw | 82.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 94.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 81.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 94.0% |
Arabs | 80.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 94.0% |
Ugandans | 80.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 94.0% |
Egyptians | 79.6 /100 | #150 | Good 94.0% |
Kenyans | 79.1 /100 | #151 | Good 94.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 78.0 /100 | #152 | Good 94.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 94.0% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 94.0% |
Spanish | 74.9 /100 | #155 | Good 94.0% |
Mongolians | 74.4 /100 | #156 | Good 94.0% |