Osage vs Cajun 2nd Grade
COMPARE
Osage
Cajun
2nd Grade
2nd Grade Comparison
Osage
Cajuns
98.2%
2ND GRADE
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
98.3%
2ND GRADE
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Cajun 2nd Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,808,929 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058 and weighted average of 98.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,712,957 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of population with at least 2nd grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%.
2nd Grade Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Cajun |
Minimum | 97.5% | 89.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 2.5% | 10.3% |
Mean | 99.2% | 98.3% |
Median | 99.2% | 98.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 98.7% | 98.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 99.9% | 99.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.67% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.66% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Cajuns by 2nd Grade
In terms of 2nd grade, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Lithuania (98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Belgium (98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Shoshone (98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Cherokee (98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from England (98.3%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Cheyenne (98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Chickasaw (98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (98.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and Russian (98.3%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2nd Grade |
Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Serbians | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Chickasaw | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Cheyenne | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Cajuns | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Shoshone | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Cherokee | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Immigrants | England | 99.4 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 98.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 98.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 98.2% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 98.2% |
Icelanders | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 98.2% |
Delaware | 99.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 98.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.1 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 98.2% |
Hopi | 99.1 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 98.2% |
Potawatomi | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 98.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 98.2% |