Lithuanian vs Czechoslovakian Professional Degree
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Czechoslovakian
Professional Degree
Professional Degree Comparison
Lithuanians
Czechoslovakians
5.4%
PROFESSIONAL DEGREE
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
PROFESSIONAL DEGREE
22.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Czechoslovakian Professional Degree Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 420,702,228 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with at least professional degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,571,969 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with at least professional degree education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.167 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 27.9%.
Professional Degree Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.24% | 0.10% |
| Maximum | 17.2% | 14.6% |
| Range | 16.9% | 14.5% |
| Mean | 4.4% | 3.7% |
| Median | 3.8% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by Professional Degree
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Professional Degree
In terms of professional degree, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Romania (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Indonesia (5.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Canada (5.3%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Professional Degree |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 99.8 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.8 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Armenians | 99.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Professional Degree
In terms of professional degree, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Middle Africa (4.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish (4.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Norwegian (4.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Nigerian (4.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (4.2%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Professional Degree |
| Immigrants | Poland | 29.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 4.3% |
| Sri Lankans | 29.0 /100 | #191 | Fair 4.3% |
| Ghanaians | 27.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 4.3% |
| French | 27.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 4.2% |
| Scandinavians | 25.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 4.2% |
| Nigerians | 24.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 4.2% |
| Spanish | 23.0 /100 | #196 | Fair 4.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 22.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 22.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 4.2% |
| Norwegians | 20.5 /100 | #199 | Fair 4.2% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 20.2 /100 | #200 | Fair 4.2% |
| Finns | 18.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 17.1 /100 | #202 | Poor 4.2% |
| Panamanians | 15.9 /100 | #203 | Poor 4.1% |
| Barbadians | 15.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 4.1% |