Chinese vs Lumbee Kindergarten
COMPARE
Chinese
Lumbee
Kindergarten
Kindergarten Comparison
Chinese
Lumbee
98.5%
KINDERGARTEN
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
98.5%
KINDERGARTEN
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Lumbee Kindergarten Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,808,307 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with at least kindergarten education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090 and weighted average of 98.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,298,794 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with at least kindergarten education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%.
Kindergarten Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Lumbee |
Minimum | 96.6% | 96.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 3.4% | 3.4% |
Mean | 98.9% | 98.9% |
Median | 99.0% | 99.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 98.5% | 98.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 99.5% | 99.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.84% | 0.96% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.83% | 0.95% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Lumbee by Kindergarten
In terms of kindergarten, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Swiss (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), French Canadian (98.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Scandinavian (98.6%, a difference of 0.020%), British (98.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and French (98.6%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Northern European (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Belgian (98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Luxembourger (98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Eastern European (98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and Native Hawaiian (98.5%, a difference of 0.010%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Kindergarten |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 98.6% |
French | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 98.6% |
French Canadians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 98.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 98.5% |
British | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Italians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Chippewa | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Lumbee | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Hungarians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 98.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 98.4% |
Ottawa | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 98.4% |