Zimbabwean vs Celtic Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Celtic
Disability
Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Celtics
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Celtic Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,588 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,868,984 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 20.1%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Celtic |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 3.8% |
| Maximum | 21.8% | 50.0% |
| Range | 17.3% | 46.2% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 16.9% |
| Median | 10.7% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Disability
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Colombia (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from South America (10.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Nonimmigrants (13.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Central American Indian (13.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Hopi (13.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Alaska Native (13.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and French (13.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 13.2% |
| French | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 13.2% |