Welsh vs Immigrants from China Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Welsh
Immigrants from China
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Welsh
Immigrants from China
17.0%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Immigrants from China Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,521,772 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Welsh and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,042,790 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 0.46%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Welsh | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 48.8% | 32.2% |
Range | 47.7% | 29.4% |
Mean | 16.3% | 16.0% |
Median | 15.7% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Immigrants from China by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Israeli (17.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Norway (17.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Lebanese (17.0%, a difference of 0.050%), French (17.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Chile (17.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Scottish (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (16.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (16.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and South African (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scottish | 95.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | China | 94.9 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 94.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Portuguese | 94.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Turks | 94.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Scandinavians | 94.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Europeans | 93.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.1 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Nicaraguans | 93.0 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 92.9 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Germany | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Lebanese | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Israelis | 91.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.9 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Welsh | 90.8 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 17.0% |
French | 90.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 17.0% |