Turkish vs Immigrants from Japan Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Japan
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Japan
9.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Japan Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,671,610 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,958,934 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 1.1%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Japan |
Minimum | 1.9% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 23.1% | 43.1% |
Range | 21.2% | 41.0% |
Mean | 9.7% | 10.7% |
Median | 8.7% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Japan by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Indonesia (9.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Australia (9.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Bulgarian (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Cuba (9.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Turkey (9.7%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Immigrants from Ireland (9.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Pakistan (9.5%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.6%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Asia (9.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Argentineans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Israelis | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.7% |