Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Slavic Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Slavic
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Slavs
2.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Slavic Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,769,787 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136 and weighted average of 2.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,835,227 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 3.4%, a difference of 37.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Slavic |
Minimum | 0.42% | 0.96% |
Maximum | 3.5% | 15.4% |
Range | 3.1% | 14.4% |
Mean | 2.2% | 5.0% |
Median | 2.3% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 5.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.74% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.74% | 3.1% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Sierra Leonean (2.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (2.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Ecuadorian (2.5%, a difference of 0.54%), Barbadian (2.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (2.5%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Barbados | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Vietnamese | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.4% |
British West Indians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Ecuadorians | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Barbadians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Dominicans | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Thais | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Polish (3.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Hmong (3.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Yaqui (3.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and Northern European (3.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Lithuanians | 0.6 /100 | #247 | Tragic 3.4% |
Austrians | 0.6 /100 | #248 | Tragic 3.4% |
Italians | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 3.4% |
Yuman | 0.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 3.4% |
Hungarians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 3.4% |
Croatians | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 3.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 3.4% |
Slavs | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 3.4% |
Poles | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 3.4% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 3.4% |
Yaqui | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 3.4% |
Northern Europeans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.4% |
Slovenes | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.5% |
Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.5% |
Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.5% |