Taiwanese vs Luxembourger Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Luxembourger
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Taiwanese
Luxembourgers
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Taiwanese vs Luxembourger Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,722,995 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,679,340 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.082 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 0.10%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Taiwanese | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 13.3% | 12.6% |
Range | 11.0% | 11.5% |
Mean | 5.7% | 5.4% |
Median | 5.4% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Taiwanese and Luxembourgers by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Jordanian (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Inupiat (5.6%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Jordanian (5.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Bulgarian (5.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |