Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Australia Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Immigrants from Australia
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Immigrants from Australia
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
76.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Australia Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,099,215 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,201,073 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.059 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 8.1%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from Australia |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.98% |
Maximum | 40.3% | 37.3% |
Range | 38.0% | 36.3% |
Mean | 18.5% | 15.9% |
Median | 18.5% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 19.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Chickasaw (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Celtic (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Brazilian (17.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Sri Lankan (17.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (17.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Basques | 85.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 17.1% |
Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |