Subsaharan African vs Bermudan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Bermudan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Bermudans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Bermudan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,720,149 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.090%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Bermudan |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 11.9% | 11.7% |
| Range | 10.6% | 10.7% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 3.5% |
| Median | 2.8% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Bermudans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |