Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Zimbabwean
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Zimbabweans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Zimbabwean Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,283,716 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.53% |
| Maximum | 29.8% | 6.9% |
| Range | 28.7% | 6.4% |
| Mean | 4.0% | 3.0% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.71% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Zimbabweans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |