South American vs Immigrants from Romania Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
South American
Immigrants from Romania
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
South Americans
Immigrants from Romania
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Immigrants from Romania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,855,959 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.489 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,972,629 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American | Immigrants from Romania |
| Minimum | 0.63% | 0.77% |
| Maximum | 9.5% | 16.3% |
| Range | 8.9% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 5.2% | 6.9% |
| Median | 5.3% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Immigrants from Romania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Ugandan (5.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Serbia (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from South America (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |