South American vs Bhutanese Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
South American
Bhutanese
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
South Americans
Bhutanese
9.9%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Bhutanese Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,521,440 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,064,702 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.005 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 0.40%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 20.4% | 21.6% |
| Range | 18.1% | 17.2% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 9.6% |
| Median | 8.6% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.0% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Bhutanese by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Colombian (9.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Armenian (9.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Peruvian (9.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Russia (9.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and Taiwanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Bulgaria (9.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Taiwanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Paraguayan (9.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Russia (9.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Greece (9.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Paraguayans | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Peruvians | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| South Americans | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Colombians | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Armenians | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.0% |