South American Indian vs Moroccan Male Disability
COMPARE
South American Indian
Moroccan
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
South American Indians
Moroccans
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
88.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
80.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Moroccan Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,560,942 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,806,730 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.81%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Moroccan |
Minimum | 4.3% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 27.7% | 28.0% |
Range | 23.4% | 22.9% |
Mean | 13.3% | 11.9% |
Median | 12.2% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 12.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians and Moroccans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.33%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Arab (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sudan (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |