Scottish vs Subsaharan African Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Scottish
Subsaharan African
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Scottish
Sub-Saharan Africans
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Subsaharan African Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,616,487 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,846,771 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scottish | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 3.1% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 62.5% | 27.3% |
Range | 59.4% | 25.7% |
Mean | 13.4% | 8.3% |
Median | 9.4% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 8.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish and Sub-Saharan Africans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Chinese (6.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (6.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Hispanic or Latino (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Dutch (6.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Germany (6.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Haitian (6.4%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 6.4% |
Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 6.4% |
Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 1.6 /100 | #241 | Tragic 6.5% |
Spaniards | 1.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 6.5% |
Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |