Samoan vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vision Disability
COMPARE
Samoan
Immigrants from El Salvador
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Samoans
Immigrants from El Salvador
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
15.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
21.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Immigrants from El Salvador Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,065,967 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,605,888 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.502 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.56%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| Minimum | 0.64% | 0.21% |
| Maximum | 5.8% | 4.1% |
| Range | 5.1% | 3.9% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 1.9% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.80% | 0.86% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 0.70% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.00% | 0.69% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Immigrants from El Salvador by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Guyana (2.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Pennsylvania German (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Dutch (2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Zaire (2.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Czechoslovakian (2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Ghanaian (2.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Thailand (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Slovak (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
| British | 25.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 24.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 23.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 23.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 2.2% |
| Ghanaians | 21.8 /100 | #197 | Fair 2.2% |
| Czechoslovakians | 21.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 21.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
| Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
| Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
| Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
| Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
| Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |