Salvadoran vs Zimbabwean Female Disability
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Zimbabwean
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Salvadorans
Zimbabweans
11.5%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Zimbabwean Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,928,715 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.448 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,785 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Salvadoran | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 5.3% | 5.7% |
Maximum | 15.3% | 20.3% |
Range | 9.9% | 14.6% |
Mean | 10.6% | 11.3% |
Median | 11.0% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 12.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans and Zimbabweans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from Vietnam (11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South America (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from El Salvador (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Colombia (11.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Sri Lankan (11.4%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Inupiat (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Peru (11.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Peruvians | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South Americans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | France | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Sri Lankans | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.5% |