Polish vs Immigrants from Thailand Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Polish
Immigrants from Thailand
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Poles
Immigrants from Thailand
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
42.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
183rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Immigrants from Thailand Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,957,387 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.94%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Immigrants from Thailand |
Minimum | 2.2% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 47.7% | 15.0% |
Range | 45.5% | 13.9% |
Mean | 9.1% | 7.0% |
Median | 6.6% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 8.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Immigrants from Thailand by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ghana (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (6.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |