Pakistani vs Immigrants from Fiji Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Pakistani
Immigrants from Fiji
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Pakistanis
Immigrants from Fiji
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
71.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Immigrants from Fiji Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,239,652 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,755,380 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.898 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.88%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pakistani | Immigrants from Fiji |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 23.0% | 20.2% |
| Range | 22.6% | 18.6% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 6.6% |
| Median | 6.4% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Immigrants from Fiji by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Fiji are Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |