Osage vs Tsimshian Female Disability
COMPARE
Osage
Tsimshian
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Osage
Tsimshian
14.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Tsimshian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,799,541 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.532 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 17.3%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 6.2% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 34.3% | 30.9% |
Range | 28.1% | 26.4% |
Mean | 18.3% | 17.3% |
Median | 16.4% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.9% | 22.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Tsimshian by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Ottawa (14.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Cape Verdean (14.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Yuman (14.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (14.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and Pima (14.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Houma (16.9%, a difference of 0.77%), Puerto Rican (16.6%, a difference of 0.94%), Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 6.2%), Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and Creek (15.7%, a difference of 7.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |