Native Hawaiian vs South American Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
South American Indian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Native Hawaiians
South American Indians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
33.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native Hawaiian vs South American Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,807,196 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.332 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,973 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Native Hawaiian | South American Indian |
Minimum | 0.98% | 0.64% |
Maximum | 7.3% | 7.1% |
Range | 6.3% | 6.4% |
Mean | 2.7% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.3% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians and South American Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Moroccan (2.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Costa Rican (2.2%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Swiss (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Brazilian (2.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Northern European (2.2%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 30.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 2.2% |