Moroccan vs Osage Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Moroccan
Osage
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Moroccans
Osage
17.6%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
5.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Osage Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,805,523 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.284 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,799,685 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154 and weighted average of 17.8%, a difference of 0.79%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Osage |
| Minimum | 8.3% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 23.2% | 25.8% |
| Range | 15.0% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 16.3% | 15.1% |
| Median | 16.4% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Osage by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Zimbabwean (17.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (17.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Salvadoran (17.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Central American (17.7%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Spanish American Indian (17.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Guatemalan (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Panamanian (17.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Mongolian (17.7%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Salvadorans | 6.7 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Icelanders | 6.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 6.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 6.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Moroccans | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Central Americans | 4.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Alsatians | 4.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Fijians | 3.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Vietnamese | 3.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Marshallese | 2.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 2.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Mongolians | 2.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Guatemalans | 2.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Tongans | 2.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Panamanians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Osage | 2.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Spanish American Indians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 1.8 /100 | #236 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 17.8% |