Mexican vs Immigrants from Western Asia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Mexican
Immigrants from Western Asia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Mexicans
Immigrants from Western Asia
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican vs Immigrants from Western Asia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 564,662,817 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,333,266 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 7.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mexican | Immigrants from Western Asia |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 8.9% | 12.5% |
| Range | 4.4% | 9.3% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 6.9% |
| Median | 6.4% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.88% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.72% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.72% | 2.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Mexicans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are Czechoslovakian (6.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (6.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Panamanian (6.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Cuban (6.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Slavic (6.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Asia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |